Friday, March 25, 2022

SUPREME COURT CANDIDATE CAN'T DEFINE "WHAT IS A WOMAN"...SHE'S "NOT A BIOLOGIST"...ASSORTED ITEMS

Welcome to Everything Croton, a collection of all things Croton-on-Hudson: our history, our homes, our issues, our businesses, our schools, our houses of worship -- in short, EVERYTHING CROTON. 

A HOT TOPIC LOCALLY---SOME RECENT PRESS:

---VIA TOM FARANDA'S FOLLY....Supreme Court candidate can't give a definition: what is a woman? CLICK HERE.

---FROM HARMEET K. DHILLON...‘Disqualifying’ words from Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson 

---THE BLAZE: Tulsi Gabbard points out 'absurdity' of Biden SCOTUS nominee refusing to define 'woman.' Her womanhood was a key reason she was nominated. MORE HERE.

---FROM THE NY POST...Judge Jackson declines to define ‘woman,’ says she’s ‘not a biologist’.... Jackson made the comment during a Tuesday exchange with Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) in which the lawmaker asked the DC Circuit Court of Appeals judge point-blank: “Can you provide a definition for the word ’woman’?  After a short back-and-forth, Jackson ultimately said: “No, I can’t.”

“You can’t?” Blackburn asked.

“Not in this context. I’m not a biologist,” Jackson said. Clips of the exchange spread like wildfire online, with critics noting Jackson’s reluctance to state the biological fact of sex. MORE AT https://nypost.com/2022/03/23/sen-blackburn-slams-judge-jackson-on-definition-of-woman/

---MORE FROM TOM FARANDA'S FOLLY AND THE BABYLON BEE HERE.

No comments:

Post a Comment