Friday, May 9, 2014

NEW 5/6/14 POSTING @ THE ADC, ANTI-DISCRIMINATION CENTER WEBSITE

Recently the ADC asked the court to hold Westchester County in contempt regarding the Spano-brokered low income/affordable housing settlement. The Journal News featured an article on this and related issues on May 6th; see http://everythingcroton.blogspot.com/2014/05/an-update-on-hud-adc-etc-journal-news.html

The ADC has updated their website with the following:
May 6, 2014 -- On May 2nd, in response to ADC's Cheating on Every Level report, the presiding judge in the Westchester case held what was billed as a status conference. Most critically, the U.S. Attorney took the position that paragraph 7(j) of the decree does not mean what it says.  That paragraph requires Westchester to do two things: (1) take all appropriate action, including litigation, to overcome hindrances to building housing units that affirmatively further fair housing under the decree....(like exclusionary or otherwise restrictive zoning) that municipalities have not themselves eliminated....read more here http://www.antibiaslaw.com/home/us-attorney-representing-hud-concocts-bizarrely-limiting-interpretation-key-consent-decree-prov

THIS POST IS CLOSED TO ALL COMMENTS. 

OCTOBER 1, 2014 UPDATE: http://www.antibiaslaw.com/article/hud-critiques-monitors-deeply-flawed-disparate-impact-analysis-monitor-flips-out

FEBRUARY 2015 UPDATE:  http://www.antibiaslaw.com/article/statement-regarding-federal-grant-workaround-being-provided-westchesters-former-consortium

No comments:

Post a Comment