Defending Education wins against Croton Harmon School District at the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. Second Circuit overrules its own precedent barring associational standing.
The case will be remanded back to the trial court to proceed. MORE AT Free Speech Suit Over NY School Bullying Policy Revived by Court
The case will be remanded back to the trial court to proceed. MORE AT Free Speech Suit Over NY School Bullying Policy Revived by Court
Read what DEFENDING EDUCATION HAD TO SAY 2024 Parents Defending Education v. Croton-Harmon Union Free School District et al. - Defending Education
Official Response Statements
- The School District: As of late this afternoon, the Croton-Harmon Union Free School District has not yet issued a formal public press release regarding the setback. The administration and Board of Education are currently reviewing the ruling with legal counsel to determine whether they will appeal to the full Supreme Court or prepare to defend the policies on their merits in district court.
- Parents Defending Education: While their formal case profile remains active on the Parents Defending Education Case Hub, the group's leadership is celebrating the opinion as a landmark victory that protects families who fear administrative or community backlash for holding dissenting viewpoints. [1, 2]
The formal written opinion text will become fully downloadable as a PDF on public legal archives like the CourtListener Docket Page under Case No. 24-1900 as the clerk's office processes the day's final filings.
DECISION HERE AT Defending Education v. Croton-Harmon Union Free School District, No. 24-1900 (2d Cir. 2026) :: Justia
and BOTTOM LINE:
Summary of the Original Grievances
The underlying lawsuit, initiated by Parents Defending Education, directly targets what advocates describe as highly restrictive, unconstitutional speech codes within the local school district: [1]
- Compelled Speech on Social Issues: The parents contend that the school policies unconstitutionally force students to adopt and endorse highly specific administrative orthodoxy regarding gender identity, race, and systemic racism. [1, 2]
- Vague Definitions of Harassment: The district's rules heavily restrict and punish speech that peers or administrators find "unwelcome," "offensive," "disparaging," or "demeaning"—even if the speech occurs entirely off school grounds. [1]
- Chilling of Diverse Viewpoints: According to the legal filing, the policies effectively threaten conservative, religious, or traditional student viewpoints on topics such as marriage, biology, immigration, and foreign policy (such as support for Israel), creating an atmosphere of fear where students must keep their beliefs to themselves to avoid disciplinary marks. [1, 2]
Oh wow! This is the first I have heard an update for a long time. Your reporting for local stuff is the best and most on the ball and accurate! Thank you very much!
ReplyDeleteI wonder how long it will take to see a final court decision on this? Thanks for sharing!
ReplyDeleteSeismic! Thank you! Looks like they went a bridge too far in the place where hate has no home and love diversity, as long as you think the right thoughts! Brian
ReplyDeleteGod bless those brave parents. In this village people can’t handle a different opinion. Everyone should have freedom of speech and beliefs. Why are people so attacked in Croton for being conservative? We need open mindedness here.
ReplyDeleteCan you imagine the wailing? You know there are a lot more people happy about these things than the other side wants to believe. We don't have endless protests with cardboard signs. We write the check and go to court instead. And we're prepared to prevail.
ReplyDeleteWow
ReplyDeleteThe amount of tax payer money that is going to be wasted to use Croton as a prop is really sad.
ReplyDelete